Your feedback is highly appreciated! Let's make Vertabelo even better.
Geen vergelijkbare onderwerpen gevonden.
0
Under review
Allow for importing data via Java Web Start or a Chrome Plugin or some other "easy" means
Lukas Eder 10 jaar geleden
•
bijgewerkt door Rafał Strzaliński (Senior Engineer) 10 jaar geleden •
2
I've recently used this very useful feature here:
http://www.vertabelo.com/blog/documentation/revers...
I found that there were a bit too many manual steps to importing a schema. All I'd like to enter is JDBC-URL (or some non-JDBC connection format), username and password and be done.
If you take DBeaver for instance (http://dbeaver.jkiss.org), it will even automaticall download the JDBC driver if applicable.
I guess this kind of functionality could be implemented in Vertabelo via a Java Web Start application, or via an applet (?) or via a Chrome Plugin...
http://www.vertabelo.com/blog/documentation/revers...
I found that there were a bit too many manual steps to importing a schema. All I'd like to enter is JDBC-URL (or some non-JDBC connection format), username and password and be done.
If you take DBeaver for instance (http://dbeaver.jkiss.org), it will even automaticall download the JDBC driver if applicable.
I guess this kind of functionality could be implemented in Vertabelo via a Java Web Start application, or via an applet (?) or via a Chrome Plugin...
0
Fixed
Placeholder bug in login form on website
Hi, I see this bug http://awesomescreenshot.com/0de3gdyv66
P.S. sorry for my english.
P.S. sorry for my english.
0
Not a bug
When primary key is selected, nullable is greyed out
When primary key is checked, the nullable column checkbox is greyed out.
This is all well and good if the nullable column is blank, but if it is checked as well, it makes it difficult to resolve the inconsistency (one has to uncheck PK, uncheck N, then re-check PK).
Suggest that either nullable checkbox should *not* be greyed out if it is checked, or alternatively that any action to check the PK field should uncheck nullable.
This is all well and good if the nullable column is blank, but if it is checked as well, it makes it difficult to resolve the inconsistency (one has to uncheck PK, uncheck N, then re-check PK).
Suggest that either nullable checkbox should *not* be greyed out if it is checked, or alternatively that any action to check the PK field should uncheck nullable.
0
Fixed
Oracle 11g support URI Type, but Vertabelo says it's invalid
John Rojas 10 jaar geleden
•
bijgewerkt door Rafał Strzaliński (Senior Engineer) 10 jaar geleden •
3
Hello,
I see a warning in my model that says:
"Type is not supported by chosen database engine"
It refers to a field that is of type uritype(256). We have checked Oracle 11g reference guide and it is supported. See this reference link for 11g:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28...
Thanks,
John
I see a warning in my model that says:
"Type is not supported by chosen database engine"
It refers to a field that is of type uritype(256). We have checked Oracle 11g reference guide and it is supported. See this reference link for 11g:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28...
Thanks,
John
0
Fixed
Pressing Enter on Reference Properties should not create a new reference
richard@tallent us 10 jaar geleden
•
bijgewerkt door Rafał Strzaliński (Senior Engineer) 10 jaar geleden •
3
If you're editing the reference name or description and press Enter, a new PK/FK reference is added to the table below. This is unexpected behavior.
0
Under review
Presentation of existing references in table is visually confusing
Under Reference Properties, the PK/FK table has two design decisions that make it less intuitive.
The first is that the form fields for creating a new relationship are shown *before* rather than after the existing relationships. The second is that the form pre-populated with values, and fields have a much lighter color than the extant rows of the table.
Combined, it is visually unintuitive to easily see the existing relationship(s).
Suggest using a different color for the existing rows, or a bold font, moving the blank form below any existing rows, and dimming the form fields.
The first is that the form fields for creating a new relationship are shown *before* rather than after the existing relationships. The second is that the form pre-populated with values, and fields have a much lighter color than the extant rows of the table.
Combined, it is visually unintuitive to easily see the existing relationship(s).
Suggest using a different color for the existing rows, or a bold font, moving the blank form below any existing rows, and dimming the form fields.
0
Declined
More advance index creation required
Currently its not possible to define indexes that use a sub length of a column. This is often used for char and byte type fields that are very long.
In mysql you can do the following
CREATE INDEX part_of_name ON customer (name(10));
In mysql you can do the following
CREATE INDEX part_of_name ON customer (name(10));
0
Declined
I would like to create multiple diagrams within a single model
It seems that only one diagram is allowed per model. For large databases, having a single diagram does not work so well.
Why can't you allow creating multiple diagrams for a single model.
Also, subject areas does not work as well, because they require related tables to be close to each other within a diagram.
With multiple diagrams, you can create diagrams specific to some topic and still use subject areas to group tables within the diagram.
Thanks!
Why can't you allow creating multiple diagrams for a single model.
Also, subject areas does not work as well, because they require related tables to be close to each other within a diagram.
With multiple diagrams, you can create diagrams specific to some topic and still use subject areas to group tables within the diagram.
Thanks!
Customer support service by UserEcho