I am unable to generate specific sections of SAML assertions in IBM DataPower while trying to digitally sign a request (Product details: Build: 277257, Firmware: IDG.7.5.1.0). I have the uploaded the public crypto certificate on DataPower but I am unable to configure DataPower to generate the following two sections (The below is the format in which the backend expects the DataPower output):

1.

<ds:KeyInfo>
  <ds:KeyValue>
    <ds:RSAKeyValue>
      <ds:Modulus>xxx</ds:Modulus>
      <ds:Exponent>xxx</ds:Exponent>
    </ds:RSAKeyValue>
  </ds:KeyValue>
</ds:KeyInfo>

2.

<ds:KeyInfo Id="KeyId-xxx">
  <wsse:SecurityTokenReference wsse11:TokenType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-saml-token-profile-1.1#SAMLV2.0" wsu:Id="xxx" xmlns:wsse11="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.1.xsd">
    <wsse:KeyIdentifier ValueType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-saml-token-profile-1.1#SAMLID">xxx</wsse:KeyIdentifier>
  </wsse:SecurityTokenReference>
</ds:KeyInfo>

Are there any settings on DataPower to generate these header? Or we need to place a custom XSL transform to generate these headers?

is there a way to import a table definition from excel? i.e. i have my columns and data types in an excel spreadsheet already and i want to import them in rather than have to key them all?

When I print my diagram as a PDF, the text in a note:

"SUMMARY: The core of this metadata model includes "data_set"s, different "data_table"s of that data set, and then for each table, the set of "variable"s it contains.  Variables exist independent of data tables, so the same variable definition can apply to multiple tables (over years where a survey remained the same, or across surveys with different names).  For each variable, you can specify a set of valid values.  You can also specify when two variables are related and basic information on how to translate between the two.  In addition, there is space to group data set collections (one of these groupings could be the set of tables included in a production process, for example) and variables independent of ("variable_group") or within ("table_variable_group") a table."

consistently turns into:

SUMMARY: The core of this metadata model includes "data_set"s, different
"data_table"s of that data set, and then for each table, the set of "variable"s it
contains. Variables exist independent tables, so same variable definition can apply
to multiple tables (over years where a survey remained same, or across surveys
with different names). For variable, you specify valid values. You also specify when
two variables are related basic information on how translate between two. In
addition, there is space group collections (one these groupings could be included in
production process, example) ("variable_group") within ("table_variable_group")
table.

Words from the original text are seemingly randomly missing, causing the text to turn into something that sounds like a garbled mess.  Any idea why this would be happening?  Is it something in my text that I might be able to alter to fix?

Thanks,

Jonathan Morgan

Please add support for unsigned and zerofill for the decimal data type.

Thanks

I was invited to a team but i cant join because i get this message, "You cannot join this account because you are a member of another team account." Please help

Nullable foreign key is definitely valid in PostgresSql however, Vertabelo throws a problem in the UI when you make it nullable.

Any way to break up columns in a table by colors. Need to use that feature to differentiate different phases of projects touching the same table.

The article at https://www.vertabelo.com/blog/technical-articles/dimensions-of-dimensions-a-look-at-data-warehousings-most-common-dimensional-table-types is very useful but there are multiple times in the article where content is missing.  For example, under SCD 1 it says this:

"If we look at the data before the change, we’d see this:

If the account type has changed, the data would simply be overwritten:"

However nothing has been added for these two comments so we don't get to see the associated data.

This happens in quite a few places in the article where I'm guessing the writer meant to go back and add images or tables etc but forgot to do it.

Just thought I'd let you know - I'm trying to refresh myself on all things dimensional and have read quite a few of your blog articles and found them very good, but this one disappoints a little in that it is not complete.